The future conflicts and wars in Africa will seldom, if ever comprise
large conventional forces pitted against one another.
Whereas conventional engagements will occur in primarily government-versus-government
actions, they will be on a much smaller scale than witnessed in the past
decades. Mobility, manoeuvre, surprise, speed and firepower will still remain
of critical importance yet these operations will be hampered by a lack of intelligence,
unreliable air support and inadequate logistics coupled to challenging terrain
and varying climatic conditions.
The presence of the local population and other non-combatants has always
– and will always – add a very real and unavoidable complexity to the
battlefield. Whereas the government forces will attempt to co-opt and win over
the support of the population, the enemy will attempt to take control over the
population to force and maintain their support.
However, when the populace believe and feel they have been forgotten,
failed and neglected or oppressed by their government, their support for an
insurgency or an invading enemy will be more energised. This in itself ought to
be cause for alarm to African governments.
In the early stages of an internal uprising or revolution, there is
often a common popular belief that the coming conflict will provide the
populace with “freedom” and “a better life”, hence their tentative support for the
insurgency or revolution. As the conflict escalates, the enemy will take steps
to protect their gains by tightening their control over the populace. This can
result in the populace being subject to physical abuse, torture, executions, forced
labour and recruitment. Any attempt by the populace to rid themselves of this
yoke of control will result in vicious and swift retribution from the enemy.
Regardless, the populace – along with refugees - will form an integral
part of the battlefield and will play a large role in the plans of both the government
and the enemy as they will become both the prize and the victim of the opposing
forces.
The future conflicts and wars in Africa will comprise a host of
different threats, groups and forces utilising both urban and rural terrain.
They will be driven by different actions and motivators employing both unconventional
and limited conventional methods. These actions and motivators will cover the
spectrum of general civil disobedience, violent and non-violent protests,
political anxiety and isolation, violent criminal activities, insurgencies,
proxy wars, state-sponsored cross-border actions, religious differences, terrorism,
tribal and ethnic anger and xenophobia, territorial and resource greed along
with poverty and hunger and so forth.
Attacks on tourist areas, shopping malls, business enterprises, hotels,
resource mining and production areas, industrial areas, airports and harbours, isolated
farms and villages, energy-supply systems, transport networks, government
buildings and communication systems will become prime enemy targets. These
attacks will be aimed at eroding the economy, over-stretching the security
forces, creating negative national and international perceptions and sapping
the will of the populace whilst creating a sense of panic.
Enemy successes will be widely proclaimed using the mainstream and
social media networks to market their successes, however limited, and instil a
sense of despondency and fear in the populace. Marketing of successes will also
be aimed at showing the inability of the government forces to successfully
counter or stop the enemy.
When unconventional enemy forces sense defeat, they will withdraw and
call for a “cease fire” and “negotiations” – a tactic aimed at gaining time,
replenishing losses and creating the impression that they want peace. This
tactic was and has been used in Angola, Sierra Leone, DRC, CAR, Nigeria, Mali,
Ivory Coast, Sudan, Mozambique and so forth. However, peace is the very last objective
they have in mind, especially when the enemy forces are acting as proxy forces
on behalf of foreign sponsors to secure foreign interests. Governments will
heed these calls for negotiations and unconditional ceasefires at their own
peril.
Whereas both the armed forces and the law enforcement agencies will play
a significant role in defeating these groups and forces in the field, they will
need to be correctly trained and equipped and have access to actionable
intelligence. Without intelligence, the enemy will always retain the initiative
and government forces will remain unbalanced and blind to enemy plans, trends
and shifts and thus remain reactive as opposed to proactive.
To ensure success, government forces will require political, military
and populace will along with resolute leadership to defeat the enemy. Furthermore,
African armies will need to break-away from their current organisational
structures and reshape themselves to take the battle to the enemy and rapidly
respond to enemy plans, actions and threats. Current structures prohibit rapid,
proactive actions.
African governments will, additionally, need to reassess the manner in
which governance is applied and maximise their use of the Pillars of State to identify,
locate and neutralise these threats. It is at the political level that serious
actions will need to be coordinated and integrated with the other Pillars.
Unless governments begin serious preparations to protect and defend themselves,
their territory and the populace, they will be ill-prepared to face the coming
conflicts and wars – and they are coming.
8 comments:
Excellent post Eeben and happy holidays to you and your family and readership!
One area of concern for me when it comes to Africa, is the spread of jihadists. That, and how organized they are getting. The whole Mali thing, or the Westgate Mall shooting in Kenya, the Il Amenas attack in Algeria, or all the attacks Boko Haram have done in Nigeria. Their latest attack in Maiduguri was astonishing. A prime example of attacking weakness with strength.
So definitely, countries need to pay close attention to what works when defending against such threats or how to prepare.
Cheers.
Africa has been and still is the target of numerous threats Matt and it will get a lot worse before it gets any better. However, a lot of these threats masquerade under the guise of “democracy” when in fact they are anything but. However, there seems to be a desire to promote conflict on the continent and with the escalation of social media, this complicates matters for governments. Let us also not forget the role foreign interests are playing in fuelling tensions as well as supporting both sides of the conflicts or, as in the case of Syria actually supporting anti-government forces with a very definite anti-West sentiment.
The vanguard for many of these threats is crime and from there it escalates into bigger problems. This can be traced back to inadequate law enforcement. Again, this is where actionable intelligence is sadly lacking. Couple that to very poor advice and you have a disaster in the making.
These groups and threats do not follow a dogmatic doctrine as western armies do. Unlike many standing armies, they learn from their mistakes. This hands them the initiative on a golden plate. Rigid, inflexible TTPs continually place the armed forces in a state of permanent reaction as opposed to proaction.
Knowing we lack intelligence and are slow to react, they can do infiltration attacks, pseudo operations, conduct terror campaigns etc and when we react, it is usually a kneejerk reaction with massive collateral damage. For many reasons, this suits their agendas.
Until such time as African armies take a long hard look at their organisations, training and equipment along with the numerous current weaknesses they have, they will be unable to identify, locate and counter the threats they face. But, for the armies to do that effectively, governments need to reassess how they govern and develop coherent national and national security strategies.
Rgds,
Eeben
Dear Eeben:
Speaking of the population getting caught in the middle in this post, I was wondering if you can tell us anything about a guy named Sam Childers who has been trying in some very unconventional ways to alleviate the suffering of kids in Southern Sudan. I am writing to ask because a movie has been released in my country called Machine Gun Preacher. Gerard Butler plays Childers and the movie claims to be based on a true story. I think Carl Alberts mentioned this guy when I was in Malagas last year. Is there any truth to the movie or does it grossly blow Childers's actions out of proportion? I kind of expect Hollywood to do this. What, if anything, have you heard about Childers?
Good to be back with the blog, graycladunits
Good to hear from you again GCU.
I have heard of Sam Childers but I have never met him.
From what I understand he too was someone who tried to do something other than talk but I also never saw the film. However, Hollywood’s depictions of “real life events” are, in my opinion, usually very far from it. If anything, I suspect Sam may have harboured some feelings about his role.
Rgds,
Eeben
Anyone in this forum happen to be in Somalia in the early 90s?
How might environmental change lead to conflict? Some experts propose that environmental change may shift the balance of power between states either regionally or globally, producing instabilities that could lead to war or as global environmental damage increases the disparity between people. Poor nations may militarily confront or struggle the rich for a greater share of the world's wealth. Warmer temperatures could lead to contention over new ice-free sea-lanes in the Arctic or more accessible resources in the Antarctic. Population growth and land stress may produce such environmental refugees. This may cause recipient's domestic and international stability. Countries may fight over dwindling supplies of water and the effects of upstream pollution” Environmental change as a source of conflict” http://bit.ly/2gIQVuT
Environmental change can have massive implications Aseni - and I believe we are already seeing some of those implications. The points you raise are, in my opinion, spot on.
Rgds,
Eeben
Post a Comment