And
now for something completely different…
I
have had repeated requests over the years to develop programmes or workshops to
share my successful warfare strategies with the corporate world.
I
now finally have some time to present these programmes and workshops on
"battle field" strategies and tactics in a business environment.
To
successfully manoeuvre within the complex and dynamic business battlefield,
players need to understand the environment in which they plan to operate. Known
as the Operating Environment (OE), it is this environment that shapes and
guides their operations. It is also the OE that can either result in success
for those who have correctly assessed it or spell disaster for those who enter
it unprepared.
The
programmes and workshops cover a number of fields including assessing and
understanding the Operating Environment, leadership, strategy, the importance
of doctrine, business “designs for battle”, the principles of marketing
warfare, phases of marketing warfare, market penetration and exploitation,
operating in hostile environments, intelligence and counter intelligence,
security and asset protection and more.
Each
workshop or training programme is designed to meet the specific requirements of
an organisation - and is therefore unique.
Interested
parties can contact me directly on the blog.
Eeben,
ReplyDeleteI'll check a couple of ideas for interest.
Rgds,
Herbert
Rather than the lessons that Business can learn from Warfare, I'm still fascinated by what Warfare learned from business in terms of generating a cashflow and a profit in short order.
ReplyDeleteWith high unemployment around the world and seeing the financial pendulum 'beginning to prepare' to swing the other way, are there lessons for the entrepreneurial 'little man'?
Be wary of rich westerners trying to buy the illusion of warrior virtue for themselves.
ReplyDeleteHi Eben, I find your approach insightful, but my focus has been the proactive side of the equation for African governments: establishing the defence information (InfoWarrior) capability that can track and inform crises as they develop, and widening the national security question to include food, infrastructure, water and civil security from a clandestine and non-active continuous monitoring standpoint.
ReplyDeleteIt would be interesting to spark up an exchange between the analyst and operator elements of the defence and intelligence landscape. interested?
That’s very kind of you – many thanks, Herbert.
ReplyDeleteRgds,
Eeben
Whereas warfare was not initially intended to generate a cash-flow Matt, we note that many modern wars are started to engage the defence industry to boost ailing economies and lay claim to resources required to boost those economies. Whereas warfare has always been viewed as an extension of politics, it is today a method of diplomatic bullying to intimidate countries and governments to hand over their resources to the bullies.
ReplyDeleteThe lessons for the “little man” are to defend the market segment you hold in as many ways possible and forge strong alliances where possible as the attacks against it are sure to come.
Rgds,
Eeben
I am not trying to sell them the virtues of the warrior Unknown but rather how to develop effective business strategies utilising military approaches and principles.
ReplyDeleteRgds,
Eeben
Our entire approach is to assist, advise and aid governments in order to adopt pro-active approaches and policies, Leonard A. Duro-Emanuel. For that very reason, we analysed every war and conflict in Africa and developed a conflict-prevention model that works. (This is merely something I do in “downtime” as I have been asked by numerous corporations to do so).
ReplyDeleteOur concern is and remains Africa and how African governments are misled, deceived and purposely given bad advice in order to keep them off balance and in conflict. Add to this the numerous foreign-backed proxies creating mayhem, the problem simply escalates.
Yes, I am interested if you intend to pursue this further.
Rgds,
Eeben
Many corporate entities in Japan have adopted a "re-engineered" and "re-understood" version of Sun Tzu`s Art of War and used the teachings in tactics, strategy, common sense, decisiveness and direct action to very good effect. Not to mention that they have also made a Kajillion Yen out of these principles and have dedicated employees.
ReplyDeleteIt makes clear sense to use some facets of military doctrine and organisation to run an effective business model. In the business arena, court martials become disciplinary hearings at the CCMA where arbitration is discussed. Firing squads make way for the more accepted but equally as devastating words " you`re fired" usually uttered by some guy with a hideous wig sitting at the end of the board room table!
People tend to miss the gist and immediately hop on the wrong train of thought when discussions about utilising military doctrine in business are recommended. Hostile mergers and takeovers will NOT involve SEAL teams! They will use something far scarier,,,, lawyers!
In my very humble opinion, the corporate world could do with some teachings in camaraderie, Opsec, discipline and defining who the enemy is. The business world seems to have become as indiscriminate as a land mine with fellow workers acting like urban guerrilla`s with questionable morals and allegiances within their own company frame work.
Mike (my 3 cents).
There are many similarities between the military battlefield and the business battlefield, Mike. Sun Tzu’s Art of War is well read by many business schools and scholars and plays an important role in business strategy.
ReplyDeleteI do not wish to impart a soldier’s ethos on a businessman. Instead, I believe that if they really comprehend strategy, they will realise the value of business intelligence and strategic vision and intent. Of course, as you point out, they need to focus on the objectives and work towards a common goal – the same things armies ought to be doing.
One reason why an incorrect train of thought occurs is through a lack of understanding. Having had some down-time (this is the only time I present such seminars/workshops), you will be amazed at how quickly businessmen grasp the principles of war and immediately find their relevance in the business environment. To me, that is good as it provides them with options – something we should always have.
You are correct: Lawyers can be as scary as the enemy!
Rgds,
Eeben
As a repentant and reformed lawyer, i agree we are scary, but that just puts in context that combat is fundamental to all life, war or business. Using your analogy. Eeben, lawyers perfor a g2 function in the business ecosystem?
ReplyDeleteYour comment “repentant and reformed” gave me a good chuckle, Leonard. That said, I have some very good friends who are lawyers.
ReplyDeleteI guess the function would encompass both G2 and G3 (Intelligence and Operations) in the business world.
Rgds,
Eeben
Leonard. My apologies about the jibe at lawyers. Look at least you have stood up in company and said. Hi my name is Leonard and I am a lawyer. I commend you.
ReplyDeleteHowever I was just joking.
Mike.
I am sure Leonard saw the humour in it Mike.
ReplyDeleteRgds,
Eeben
Thanks for your comment, Frederic.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, you did not include your email address so I am unable to contact you. If you send it to me via the blog, I shall not publish it.
Rgds,
Eeben
Hi Mr Barlow,
ReplyDeleteI am currently studying an MBA (WITS) and for my Research Project I would like to compare or analyse how former military members in EXCO Positions are able to identify risks, threats and opportunities in the market as compared to Businessman who do not have that training.
In essence does the military training provide an advantage or a disadvantage to the military member.
I would like to interview you in order to gather information and if you would like to assist me in this Project I would greatly appreciate it.
Please feel free to contact me on:
wm.jonsson@gmail.com
Regards
Wesley-Mark Jonsson
Thank you but no thank you, Wesley-Mark.
ReplyDeleteRgds,
Eeben